One of the best films of 2018, Alex Garland’s cunning sci-fi masterpiece Annihilation is unlike anything else you’ll ever see. Taking things to an even greater level than Garland did in his equally stellar debut film (Ex Machina), Annihilation is extremely warped—to the point where many can’t handle it. But if you’re fine with a few terrifying scenes, some very heady science (branching into extreme biology & astrobiology), unconventional cinematography, and a well-paced cinematic feel that I can only describe as “quasi-horror indie sci-fi action,” you’ll love this film. Plus, technical flairs aside, you can’t go wrong with an acclaimed film starring Natalie Portman, Oscar Isaac, and Tessa Thompson. And though the film’s opening 90 minutes aren’t quite as magical as the last 30, it’s all worth it.
As for the screenplay, the first sequence that comes to mind is an extremely bold one spanning from the lighthouse scenes onward. I’ll discuss it later. But speaking of this “shimmer” (the nexus of the plot): It is an area of a U.S. state park that, after being struck by a strange meteorite, begins to transform all life within it. This spans from extreme biological changes in plants to the changing of the actual DNA of animals in the zone). And it won’t stop growing. And none of the military personnel deployed into the zone have made it back alive anyway. So the zone poses a highly classified yet major existential threat to the entire planet—as well as a galvanizing force in terms of motivating characters to risk their lives. The focus of the story, then, becomes an all-female team of civilian scientists who enter the zone for answers and—in one way or another—some redemption.
Needless to say, this isn’t just another sci-film that unfolds in a generic manner. For although the directing and acting are already sharp, the technical aspects really set Annihilation apart from the sci-fi stereotype. Moreover, its delivery is compounded exponentially by the astonishing final sequence of events. It serves a few twists that not only wrap up the story well but also stay in your head for a while, thereby sequestering your mind to a state of curious befuddlement as to what you just saw. Warning: I’m linking a clip that unfolds near the end for those of you who aren’t sold yet. It could’ve been cheesy, but—due to some of the most scintillating visual effects ever and mercurial sound effects—it will make your jaw drop. It’s also an apt microcosm for the film’s overall panorama of visual, scientific, and intellectual art.
Rating: 8.5/10
One of the coolest sequences I have ever seen.
❤️❤️
😜
Wow
🤠
As a complement to your review, HERE is an interesting interview with a scientist who explores other worlds through astronomy, in the real world:
https://catxman.wordpress.com/2021/07/28/tv-interview-with-an-exoplanetarist/
These “exoplanets” have been found in the hundreds and may harbor alien life. It’s a fascinating topic and one worth learning more about.
— Catxman
http://www.catxman.wordpress.com
About to read it. So excited and thanks for sharing!
Great interview! Astrophysics was my first major in college and remains one of my favorite topics. The topic of exoplanets is so fascinating. Granted, we’ve been able to explore exoplanets in the hundreds via direct imaging, transit, microlensing, radial velocity, etc. in the relative periphery our solar system, but—in my opinion—the reality is that (insofar as the estimated number of stars in our galaxy remains in the hundreds of billions) there are likely billions or even tens of billions of planets in our galaxy alone that are capable of hosting life. Obviously, these numbers are constantly changing due to technological innovation and discoveries that nullified past understandings, but my belief that there are trillions of life forms in our magnificent universe remains firm and in tact. Appreciate the comment!
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/06/200616100831.htm
https://www.space.com/21800-alien-planets-60-billion-habitable-exoplanets.html
P.S. So excited to see what evidence the James Webb telescope produces once NASA launches it to replace the Hubble!
https://www.jwst.nasa.gov/
https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2021/james-webb-space-telescope-testing-progress-continues
A unique sci-fi film for sure. That indeed leaves us curious and befuddled. Nice review!
Thanks so much!
Thank you so much for sharing!
Great review, Luke! Annihilation is one of my personal favorites. Vastly underrated, in my opinion.
Thanks, Cristian! And I totally agree.
Great review of a complex movie.
Appreciate it!
bet
You’re totally right, this is an unusual manner to treat Sci-fi. It reminds me the “Colour out of space” by H.P. Lovecraft who described in his novel the same strange phenomena. Portman is excellent, and so is Oscar Isaac. the ending is quite metaphysical, not so far from the Tarkovski’s universe.
Interesting! I saw HBO’s Lovecraft Country last year—amazing show—and thus read into some stuff about Mr. Lovecraft (even though he has nothing to do with the show ha) but not sure I remember reading about “Colour out of Space.” Looking it up!
And so true, as for Portman/Isaac! As a fellow Harvard person I’m biased toward Natalie anyway, but Isaac impresses me more & more as time progresses. Also, so interesting that you evoke Tarkovski! I watched that interview where Tarantino compared Interstellar and other Nolan films to those of Terrence Malick/Tarkovsky recently and was just so happy to be reminded that they all exist in the same universe together. Love Solaris but need to see more Tarkovsky before I mention him in the same breath as these other directors with whom I’m (sadly) far more familiar!
I heard about that show inspired by the author. The reading is more instructive I think, I recommand particularly that novel.
Interesting comparison by Mr T! If you’ve seen “Solaris”, you must remember the double wife of Chris Kelvin which is projection of his mind. That was a reflexion of grief, so did Garland in Annihilation.
It’s a fantastic show. I highly recommend (though I’m not sure many others would say the same). Very different from Lovecraft’s content from what I’ve read but nice to know that he was a source of inspiration!
And wow, very true. Never thought about that parallel in the handling of grief between both Solaris and Annihilation!
Oscar Isaac continues to add to his impressive body of work. I think that he is very good.
Agreed! Incredible in Inside Llewyn Davis, Ex Machina, etc.
Assuming you saw the ending of Ex Machina as well, right? So incredible.
Sure! That was already a very current and existential question
And indeed!
It is good. I recommend watching it. It’s not 100% horror, but there are some very effective horror moments. There is also an underlying theme of cosmic horror. The analyses I’ve heard about this movie want to talk about the nature of humanity and other philosophical elements of the story, the there’s also real horror there in the implications.
Fair enough.
One thing I will say though is that I really do think it’s unfair to Alex Garland to treat this as a “horror” film, as I’m sure you’d probably agree. It seems like people are okay with genre mixers at this point (i.e. Get Out), but for whatever reason it seems to me like Horror fans are a bit more traditional in the sense that they still expect certain things out of films that are billed as “horror” merely because they were billed as such. I think of the concept of “genre” as just a social construct and not something that needs to exist within the parameters of thought when it comes to film, but I do revert to it at times in discussions for the sake of reference. But anyway, my main point is just that Garland’s vision transcends genre and is much, much, much more than a mere genre piece. Sorry for the rant! Ha
💯
Agreed completely. These Sci-fi thrillers like this and A Quiet Place aren’t really horror films. But they will put you on the edge of your seat and keep you engaged. All the while you think. There are always some visual starts, but they aren’t hack and slash blood films.
Very true as well. Genre mixers but potent regardless of how they are semantically framed by viewers!
Neat –
🤝
We collectively deserve it.
😏
Love the username lol.
I concur.